Legal Opinion

Wriggelsworth v. Brumbaugh

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 1, 2001No. 5:00-cv-00015PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court in light of its Opinion and Partial Judgment of November 30, 2000. Said Opinion and Partial Judgment granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Ellis Brumbaugh and determined that issues of damages would be determined after receipt of briefing from interested parties. The Court has now received the scheduled briefing on the issue of damages and determines that summary judgment may be granted on the various issues of damages because there are no genuine issues of material fact respecting damages.

Factual Background

U…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Orange County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. Harris v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  3. Ferguson v. WalkerDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Paxton v. City of MontebelloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Hogan v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API