Legal Opinion

Young v. Dept. of Labor and Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 8, 1996No. 14621-9-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

913 P.2d 402 (1996)

81 Wash.App. 123

Pauline YOUNG, Respondent,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Defendant,

Sisters of Charity of Providence, Appellant.

No. 14621-9-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.

April 2, 1996.

As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration May 8, 1996.[*]

Schuyler T. Wallace, Jr., Edward S. McGlone, III, Wallace & Klor, Portland, OR, for appellant.

Patrick K. Stiley, Derek W. Madel, Stiley & Associates, Spokane, for respondent.

SCHULTHEIS, Judge.

After reviewing a Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals decision affirming a Department of Labor and Industries (L…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Petersen v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Ferencak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. KUSTURA v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Somsak v. CRITON TECHNOLOGIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Hill v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API