Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 1938No. 27951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The facts are as follows: One Walter Clem was authorized to and did employ plaintiff and also Justin Tiner and Joes Havens to distribute handbills for defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co. A. car, owned by defendant Woodward, who was also in the employ of Sears, Roebuck & Co., and who received pay based on mileage for its use, was used by Walter Clem to drive plaintiff and his associates from place to place to distribute the handbills. The accident, the damages for which this suit was brought, occurred while Clem, Tiner,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FoltzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pierce Oil Corporation v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. PiggeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Peppers Gasoline Co. v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Holland v. PERRAULT BROTHERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Fount Furlong and H. v. Highley, Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953