Western Electric Co. v. Capital Telephone & Telegraph Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
Upon the calling of this case for final hearing, the complainant moved to exclude from the record the deposition of Charles H. Aldrich, and certain documents printed in the defendants’ record, and specifically referred to in the motion. The grounds'of the motion, as stated, are:
“That said deposition was improperly and irregularly taken and filed, and is wholly irrelevant and-immaterial, and that said documents were not proven, or properly offered, and are incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial.”
The deposition was not taken within the time prescribed or permitted by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-Town RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Dempster Mill Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- I. F. Laucks, Inc. v. Kaseno Products Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- Fruit Cleaning Co. v. Fresno Home-Packing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
- Star Ball Player Co. v. Baseball Display Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1925