Legal Opinion
I. F. Laucks, Inc. v. Kaseno Products Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 15, 1932No. Nos. 621, 659PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
These suits are for the infringement of three patents for cold process glues. In this, opinion these patents will be referred to as the Johnson patent, the caustic soda patent, and the carbon bisulphide patent, except where otherewise indicated.
The defendants Kaseno Products Company and George F. Linquist will be referred to as the defendants.
Johnson Patent.
The first of the three patents, in time, is the reissues of the Johnson patent of July 3, 1923, reissue No. 16,422, original No. 1,460,-757. Claims 5 and 8 of this patent are not in suit. The claims in suit comprise…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marks v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- Chas. H. Lilly Co. v. I. F. Laucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- La Maur, Inc. v. L. S. Donaldson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1961
- Chas. H. Lilly Co. v. I. F. Laucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.