Legal Opinion
Star Ball Player Co. v. Baseball Display Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 22, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUNYON, District Judge.
The plaintiff above named has brought suit herein alleging infringement by the defendant, during the year 1922, of letters patent No.'1,321,-940, issued to Paul C. Oscanyan, bearing date November 18, 1919, the application for which was filed April 28,1917.
The device in question represents a baseball field, arranged on a vertical plane, and is designed to vizualize for spectators the various plays in a game of baseball, being manually operated for that purpose by attendants standing in the rear, and acting upon detailed information conveyed to them from the playing field…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Packard v. Lacing Stud Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
- Potter v. CrowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1866
- Western Electric Co. v. Capital Telephone & Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- I. F. Laucks, Inc. v. Kaseno Products Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- Baseball Display Co. v. Star Ballplayer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- J. R. Clark Co. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1960