Legal Opinion

United States v. Barnes

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1982No. CR-80-118-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The Defendant has filed a Motion under Rule 32(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 for permission to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere and to enter a plea of not guilty by reason of temporary insanity. The Defendant, acting pro se, has filed a supporting Brief with exhibit, and the Government has responded with a Brief in opposition to the Motion. The Defendant bases his claim for relief upon an allegation that he was mentally incompetent to enter his plea.

This Motion comes before the Court after sentencing upon the Defendant’s plea to one count…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Maurice Anton Kienlen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Robert Lee Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Robert John Wolcott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API