Legal Opinion

United States v. One Dodge Sedan

District Court, D. California

Decided May 2, 1928No. 19431PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

This is a libel to forfeit the respondent, for that, as alleged, it was used to remove, conceal, and deposit Ng Ka Py liquor with intent to defraud the plaintiff of taxes thereon imposed, due and unpaid.

The evidence is that in June, 1927, federal prohibition agents apprehended the respondent with three other autos. The latter vehicles were loaded with smuggled Ng Ka Py whisky and other intoxicating liquors. No tax stamps appeared thereon. The former conveyance was the armed convoy, or pilot and guard, of the others, but itself contained none of said liquors.

Section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. One 6-54-B Oakland Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
  2. United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. ONE DODGE COUPE, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. United States Ex Rel. Baglivo v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  5. United States v. One 1941 Pontiac SedanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API