Legal Opinion
Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 28, 1980No. Court 77-8-02005. C.D. 4838PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, American manufacturers and/or wholesalers of certain hand tools, contest the negative injury determination of the United States Tariff Commission (“Commission”) 1 in Wrenches, Pliers, Screwdrivers, and Metal-Cutting Snips and Shears From Japan, Investigation No. AA1921 — 141 (39 FR 38133 (1974), under the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 160, et seq. (1970)). This action has been brought under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1582(b) (1976), 28 U.S.C. § 2632(a) (1976) and 19 U.S.C. § 1516(c) (1976). Daido Corporation, Steelcraft Tools…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- British Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.