British Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Review of International Trade Commission’s Affirmative Determination of Material Injury on Agency Record Pursuant to Rule 56.1 — Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom
NEWMAN, Senior Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs, British Steel Corporation and British Steel Corporation, Inc. (collectively referred to as plaintiffs or British Steel), seek review upon the agency record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the final determination by the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) that “an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of stainless steel plate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Humboldt Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert L. Curtis and Southern Forwarding Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Maine Potato Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.