Legal Opinion

Himebauch v. Ludtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

We have taken due note of the argument made on behalf of the plaintiff to the effect that an order granting a new trial in the interests of justice is highly discretionary and will not be reversed unless there is an abuse of discretion. It is also true that an order granting a new trial in the interests of justice will be reversed where the evidence in the record is not sufficient under any view to sustain a finding of negligence, and a verdict should have been directed. Crombie v. Powers (1930), 200 Wis. 299, 227 N. W. 278.

Upon this appeal we are concerned only with the evidence relating to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Madison Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crombie v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Burt v. MeunierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VettingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Strnad v. Co-Operative Insurance MutualWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Betchkal v. WillisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wellman v. MoesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Betchkal v. WillisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API