Legal Opinion

Etchison v. Lusk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pemiscot County Circuit Court. — Hon. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

The plaintiff, Catherine Etchison, recovered a judgment for $1500 on account of personal injuries sustained by reason of the alleged negligence of defendants’ employees operating a switch engine which jammed certain cars into a railroad car *190in which the plaintiff was standing. Prom this judgment the defendants appealed assigning several errors all of which center ahont and are determined by a disposition of the question raised by defendants’ refused instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, which will result in a determination of the question of the liability of the defendants…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Brown v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Farber v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Eason v. S. & E. T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Louis Architectural Iron Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. O'CONNELL v. Roper Electric Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Shafer v. St. Louis, San Francisco Railway, Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. McFarlane v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rooney v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API