Eason v. S. & E. T. R'y Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Hardin. Tried below before the Hon. Edwin Hobby.
1Opinion of the Court
Willie, Chief Justice.
The demurrer to the petition was sustained, it seems, on the ground that the appellant, in performing the duty of a brakeman at the time he was injured, assumed all the risks incident to the position, and, hence, could not recover for an injury caused by the negligence of a fellow servant. This is the law when *578the injured party is a mere volunteer in the performance of the service. For instance, where one having no interest in the loading or unloading of a car, or in the carriage or delivery of passengers or freight, volunteers to assist in reference to such matters,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Orleans, Jackson & Great Northern Railroad v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
- Mayton v. T. & P. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by46 opinions
- Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Aga v. HarbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Welch v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Valparaiso Lighting Co. v. TylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.