McFarlane v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
This case concerns a coffee pot and a freight train.
The testimony, as it must have been found by the jury, showed that the respondent, Mrs. McFarlane, was employed by the appellant railway company under a written contract to furnish meals for the appellant’s bridge gang crew working at various points along the branch line of the railway known as the Tacoma & Eastern Railway. The bridge gang had been working at the station at Mineral, and upon the completion of the work there were ordered to work on a bridge near the station of Alder, this being the third station from Mineral towards Tacoma.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Brown v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Howe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AgtucaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Smith v. S & F Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Newcomer v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State v. AgtucaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974