Legal Opinion

McFarlane v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1924No. 18460PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This case concerns a coffee pot and a freight train.

The testimony, as it must have been found by the jury, showed that the respondent, Mrs. McFarlane, was employed by the appellant railway company under a written contract to furnish meals for the appellant’s bridge gang crew working at various points along the branch line of the railway known as the Tacoma & Eastern Railway. The bridge gang had been working at the station at Mineral, and upon the completion of the work there were ordered to work on a bridge near the station of Alder, this being the third station from Mineral towards Tacoma.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Howe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AgtucaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Smith v. S & F Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Newcomer v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. State v. AgtucaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API