Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Randle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 1, 1930No. 6 Div. 576PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The assignments of error challenge only the action of the trial court in granting appellee’s motion for a new trial, and thereby setting aside the verdict of the jury and judgment rendered thereon.

The complaint contained but one count, alleging, among other things, that defendant’s train ran “upon, against or struck” plaintiff’s truck upon a public crossing, demolishing, etc.; that said damage was a proximate consequence of the wanton conduct of the agent and servants of defendant in charge of the operation and running of said train, acting in the line and scope of their employment, which…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. So. Ry. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. HyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Chambers v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Ridgeway v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Roberts v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API