Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1939No. 1 Div. 36PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action/for personal injuries received by a passenger in an automobile in collision with a railway locomotive at a public street crossing in the City of Mobile.

Many questions are presented by assignments of error, oral arguments, and elaborate briefs. Among them, alleged errors in the oral charge of the court, even as,unjudicial in. manner and matter, and the result of efforts of defendant’s counsel tq cure such errors by withdrawal; alleged errors in given and refused charges in writing; and alleged errors in , rulings on pleadings, and on evidence.

We deal first with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Weatherly v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Bledsoe ex rel. Bledsoe v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Callaway v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API