Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1933No. 6 Div. 306PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff, a resident of the neighborhood and entirely familiar with the crossing, in disregard of the doctrine of “stop, look, and listen,” ran his Buick car, at an estimated speed of ten or fifteen miles per hour, into the side of defendant’s engine tank, and recovered a judgment for the damages sustained. There were no obstructions to impair his view, but the “visibility was not good,” due to cloudy conditions following rain and failure of his windshield wiper to properly function. Manifestly there could be no recovery based upon any initial negligence of defendant. Ala.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Bledsoe ex rel. Bledsoe v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API