Southern Ry. Co. v. Miller
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Plaintiff, a resident of the neighborhood and entirely familiar with the crossing, in disregard of the doctrine of “stop, look, and listen,” ran his Buick car, at an estimated speed of ten or fifteen miles per hour, into the side of defendant’s engine tank, and recovered a judgment for the damages sustained. There were no obstructions to impair his view, but the “visibility was not good,” due to cloudy conditions following rain and failure of his windshield wiper to properly function. Manifestly there could be no recovery based upon any initial negligence of defendant. Ala.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Bledsoe ex rel. Bledsoe v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.