Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Walker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1976No. 111 Disciplinary Docket 1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

This is a direct review 1 of a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that respondent Boyd H. Walker be publicly censured by this Court for professional misconduct occurring during the administration of the estate of Rosa H. Henninger.

The essential facts of this case are undisputed. Rosa H. Henninger (Henninger), an 85 year old woman, executed a will and a revocable inter vivos trust in June of 1966. The will, executed on June 1, 1966, named Henninger’s three nephews and a niece as residuary legatees and nominated the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. In re DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Matter of LeopoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API