Legal Opinion
First Nationwide Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 30, 2003No. 96-590CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this Winstar1 related contract action is plaintiffs’ September 26, 2001 motion for summary judgment on damages and plaintiffs’ October 7, 2002 motion to strike. Most of the issues raised in the summary judgment motion were resolved in the court’s opinion of March 8, 2002. First Nationwide Bank v. United States, 51 Fed.Cl. 762 (2002) (“First Nationwide III”). The court held oral argument on the remaining issue of plaintiffs’ damages on January 21, 2003. For the reasons set out below, plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion is granted. Plaintiffs’ motion to strike…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Joseph Sternberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Spenco, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- In Re Kellett Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Home Savings of America, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.