Legal Opinion

Centex Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 7, 2001No. 96-494CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending in this Wmsfar-related1 case are plaintiffs’ Renewed2 Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability; defendant’s Cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment; defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum and “Comparison” of Proposed Findings; plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Surreply Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment; plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Corrected Surreply Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Notice…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. First Heights Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. National Australia Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API