Legal Opinion
Fuqua v. Tulsa Masonic Bldg. Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1928No. 17118PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Plaintiff below, Tulsa Masonic’ Building Association, a corporation, secured a judgment against the defendants below, J. R. Fuqua and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, in the sum of $14,410.41. The action was based upon a breach of a builder’s bond, wherein Fuqua was principal and the casualty company was a surety for hire.
On June 20, 1922, plaintiff entered into a written contract with Fuqua wherein the latter agreed to furnish the material and perform the labor in constructing the Masonic Temple at Tulsa, for the consideration of $77,450, in consideration of the faithful performance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- School District No. 1 v. McCurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Bryan v. Orient Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lackland v. EdwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Wilson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lum v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Wright v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. United Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- New York Indemnity Co. v. MayArizona Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.