Legal Opinion
In Re Everick Art Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1930No. 223PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The contention of counsel for the bankrupt appears to be that, by listing a creditor with the notation that his claim is disputed, a bankrupt may obtain all the advantages and incur none of the obligations which follow from offering a composition to his creditors; that is, the disputed claim, should it turn out to- be good, will be discharged by the confirmation of the composition, but there is no obligation to provide for the contingency that the claim! may be valid in depositing the consideration to be paid to creditors under the terms of the proposed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re Watman, Konopolsky & BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Idaho Irr. Co. v. GoodingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- In Re M. D. Mirsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- R.I.D.C. Industrial Development Fund v. P. L. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Scheuer v. Salmon Weed & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- In The Matter Of Banque De Financement, S. A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Banque de Financement, S. A. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.