Legal Opinion
Idaho Irr. Co. v. Gooding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1922No. 3797PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is another controversy growing out of the system of reclamation ox desert land in certain public land states provided by the Act of A.ugust 18, 1894, known as the Carey Act (28 Stat. 372, 422), as amended by the Act of June 11, 1896 (29 Stat. 413, 434 [Comp. St. §§ 4685, 4686]). The public lands involved in this case are located in the state of Idaho, and the statutes of that state relating to the appropriation of water for the co-operating scheme in reclaiming the desert lands of the state are found in sections 1613 to 1634 of the Revised Codes of Idaho of 1908…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Brockett v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Everick Art CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. HeadArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Idaho Irrigation Co. v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Peck v. BersantiMontana Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.