Legal Opinion
In Re M. D. Mirsky & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 6, 1929No. 332PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The claim of Aqua Realty Corporation stands upon a somewhat different footing from the others and may conveniently bo discussed first. This creditor was listed in the bankrupt’s schedules and at a given figure. It is true that the debt was stated to be in dispute and that no cash consideration to cover it was deposited in the composition offer; but before the composition was confirmed the bankrupt was required to give a bond to secure to this creditor payment of the composition dividend in the event that the elaim should be allowed. The regularity of this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re LaneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- In re SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Everick Art CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Newman & BiscoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- In Re Brigantine Beach Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- In re J. B. Pollack Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In re Vulcan & Reiter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.