Legal Opinion
Hiller v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Used Motor Vehicle & Parts Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 2003No. 01-6402PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Willa Hiller currently finds herself in a catch-22 situation, caught between the requirements of Title VII and the federal regulations formalizing a work-sharing agreement between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Ms. Hiller brought this action against the State of Oklahoma, contending her discharge by the Used Motor Vehicle & Parts Commission violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court granted the state’s motion for summary judgment based on Ms. Hiller’s failure…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Martinez v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Diane FOUCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the JEKYLL ISLAND-STATE PARK AUTHORITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carrie A. McMellon Lori Dawn White Kathy D. Templeton Cheri Call v. United States of America United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Zia Shadows, L.L.C. v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Campos v. Las Cruces Nursing CenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Front Range Equine Rescue v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.