People v. Jiminez
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMax Bloom, J.
These are four separate proceedings brought by the four defendants involved to set aside the sentences heretofore imposed upon them under section 75.20 of the Penal Law. One of the defendants, Jiminez, attempted to proceed by habeas corpus. However, Special Term treated the application as one for resentence under GPL 440.20 and referred it to the arraignment part for disposition. The other three defendants, all represented by the same counsel, adopted the procedure suggested at Special Term, and moved directly in the arraignment part.
Inasmuch as there is no contention that the sentences were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Donald Bernard Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Neil Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- People ex rel. Johnson v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People ex rel. Johnson v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People ex rel. Cromwell v. WardenNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- In re Anthony N.New York City Family Court · 1980
- United States Ex Rel. Sero v. PreiserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- People v. Hutchings, New York County Courts1973
- Hiney v. La ValleeNew York Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.