United States Ex Rel. Sero v. Preiser
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LASKER, District Judge.
The continuous procession of motions in this action which challenges the constitutionality of Article 75.00 of the Penal Law of New York is now augmented by petitioners’- alternative motions for full or partial summary judgment. The vicissitudes of the ease have called upon us before this to write a textbook’s worth of opinions on various facets and issues. 1 It is unnecessary at this writing to review the facts, or to redefine the legal parameters of the proceeding, all of which are exhaustively — and somewhat exhaustingly — expounded in the earlier decisions.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Exparte CrouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Gesicki v. OswaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Lois Sero v. Peter PreiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- People v. Daniel J. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Hiney v. La ValleeNew York Supreme Court · 1975