Legal Opinion

Zelinger v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 8, 1986No. 84SA508PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOLLACK, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants, members of a class action suit, appeal the judgment of the district court upholding the constitutionality of the City and County of Denver Municipal Ordinance No. 160, Series of 1980 [hereinafter referred to as “Ordinance”]. The plaintiffs-appellants claim the Ordinance, which deals with storm drainage facilities and the fees and service charges therefor, unconstitutionally denies equal protection and due process guarantees to property owners. They also contend the Ordinance is an unconstitutional property tax. We disagree and affirm the district court.

I

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Western Heights Land Corp. v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Denver City Railway Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Loup-Miller Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Bloom v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  5. Wolf Ranch, LLC v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API