Legal Opinion

Bloom v. City of Fort Collins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 16, 1990No. 88SA162PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Quinn

The City of Fort Collins appeals from a district court judgment invalidating a city ordinance that imposes upon owners or occupants of any developed lots or parcels of land within the city a “transportation utility fee" for the purpose of providing reve*305nues for the maintenance of local streets and that authorizes the city council to transfer any excess revenues collected under the ordinance to any other fund of the city. The district court held that the transportation utility fee constituted an invalid property tax that did not conform to the uniformity requirement of article X, section 3 of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Walker v. BedfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Krupp v. Breckenridge Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Kragnes v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API