Territory of Guam v. Ignacio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
Defendants Manibusan, Ignacio and Bamba appeal their convictions of conspiracy to misappropriate money appropriated to combat Guam’s heroin problem, in violation of 9 Guam Code Ann. § 13.30.
I. THE INDICTMENT
The defendants first contend that the indictment did not state an offense under Guam law because it did not allege overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy after January 1, 1978, the date the applicable conspiracy law took effect. See 9 Guam Code Ann. § 90.84, Section 2. We review de novo the Appellate Division’s interpretation of local law. Guam v. Yang, 850 F.2d…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. John Waldo Birges, Sr., Terry Lee HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Juan P. Ignacio, the People of the Territory of Guam v. Pedro A.E. Manibusan, the People of the Territory of Guam v. Francisco B. BambaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Madison v. IBP, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1999