Legal Opinion

Clerk of Superior Court of Guilford County v. Guilford Builders Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1987No. 8718DC261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriate only in those cases where the materials before the court show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). An issue of fact is material if its resolution “would affect the result of the action.” City of Thomasville v. Lease-Afex, Inc., 300 N.C. 651, 654, 268 S.E. 2d 190, 193 (1980), quoting Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 518, 186 S.E. 2d 897, 901 (1972). Although Haines and Guilford both claim to be entitled to summary judgment in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. City of Thomasville v. Lease-Afex, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Casket Co. v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MacK v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Skeens v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Messer v. Laurel Hill AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Pritchett & Burch, PLLC v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Poole v. Gwin, Lewis & Punches, LLPMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API