Legal Opinion

City of Thomasville v. Lease-Afex, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 107PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

The sole question on this appeal is whether defendant, in this products liability case, is entitled to summary judgment. The Court of Appeals held that summary judgment was proper. We reverse.

Rule 56(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment will be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

An issue is genuine if it “may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sadler ex rel. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API