Legal Opinion

Skeens v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 27, 1993No. 61, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this case to determine at what time an attorney, who is retained on a contingent fee agreement and who is discharged without cause by the client prior to the occurrence of the contingency, may recover for the reasonable value of the services performed prior to discharge.

I

On June 28, 1989, respondent, Helen Martha Miller, retained petitioner, Edward John Skeens, to represent her in a personal injury claim arising out of an automobile accident that had occurred several days earlier. Their written agreement embodied a typical contingent fee…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. In Re Dennis E. CARLSON, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Somuah v. FlachsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Massachusetts v. Sohmer (In Re Sohmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. First Union National Bank v. Meyer, Faller, Weisman & Rosenberg, P.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API