Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1988No. 317A87PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

In this case, we address the issue of the State’s sovereign immunity defense to a betterments claim for improvements made to *434certain timberland in Craven County, North Carolina. Contrary to the Court of Appeals’ conclusion, we hold that under the facts of this case, the State is shielded by its sovereign immunity from Taylor’s claim for betterments. We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals on this issue.

On 20 January 1971, defendant J. T. Taylor, Jr. (“Taylor”) obtained from the Brandenburg Land Company (“Brandenburg”) a deed for a tract of timberland in Craven County. After…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Floyd v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. General Electric Company v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Wharton v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Huyck Corp. v. C. C. Mangum, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Department of Transportation v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. RPR & ASSOCIATES v. O'Brien/Atkins AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
  4. Golden Rule Insurance v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Coastland Corp. v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API