Legal Opinion

Golden Rule Insurance v. Long

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1993No. 9210SC677PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

When a suit is brought against a public official in his official capacity the issue of sovereign immunity is raised. See Bland v. City of Wilmington, 278 N.C. 657, 180 S.E.2d 813 (1971). “The doctrine of sovereign immunity — that the State cannot be sued without its consent —has long been the law in North Carolina.” Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 309, 222 S.E.2d 412, 417 (1976). The doctrine proscribes, among others, “suits to prevent a State officer or commission from performing official duties or to control the exercise of judgment on the part of State officers or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Ellis v. Smith-Broadhurst, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hardin v. KCS International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Country Club of Johnston County, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Moore v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Leftwich v. GainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API