Legal Opinion
City of Houston v. Harris County Eastex Oaks Water & Sewer District
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 20, 1969No. 15342PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing
PEDEN, Justice.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our opinion of November 21, 1968 is withdrawn and the following is substituted for it:
The City of Houston has perfected this appeal from an order permanently enjoining it from proceeding further under its Ordinance No. 67-262 with annexation of an area described in the ordinance as Portion No. 1 (consisting of 2.119 square miles located between the Cities of Houston and Humble), from levying taxes and from acquiring by annexation the properties and assets of the Harris County Eastex Oaks Water and Sewer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Deacon v. City of EulessTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Houston v. State Ex Rel West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Kuhn v. City of YoakumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Beyer v. Templeton, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Houston v. Savely, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- City of Willow Park v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- City of Arlington v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- City of Nassau Bay v. City of WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.