Legal Opinion

Deacon v. City of Euless

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1966No. A-11263PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

405 S.W.2d 59 (1966)

W. Floyd DEACON et al., Petitioners,

v.

CITY OF EULESS, Texas, Respondent.

No. A-11263.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 6, 1966.

Rehearing Denied July 27, 1966.

Shirley W. Peters, Denton, for petitioners.

Bondurant & Cribbs, Arlington, H. P. Kucera, Dallas, for respondent.

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

By their suit petitioners, W. Floyd Deacon, Priest Baze and C. O. Crumbley, plaintiffs in the trial court, sought judgment declaring City of Euless annexation ordinances Nos. 189, 190 and 192 void, and enjoining the City and its officers from levying taxes against their lands and otherwise…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ex Parte AbellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Proctor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1998

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API