Legal Opinion
Marlene's, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 4, 1954No. 11046_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners seek to set aside a cease and desist order issued by the Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45. They include Marlene’s Inc., and R. J. Smasal and James 0. Webb as officers of the corporate petitioner, R. J. Smasal individually, and Edward H. Larson and Nelson J. McMahon individually, and doing business as O’Neil, Larson & McMahon.
The Commission filed a complaint averring that Marlene’s and its named officers, are now, and for some time past have been, engaged in the distribution and sale of a drug compound (Mynex) in conjunction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Federal Trade Commission v. Civil Service Training Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Abel Allan Goodman, an Individual Trading as Weavers Guild v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Commonwealth v. PercudaniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.