Legal Opinion
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 6, 1944No. 8116PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*214LINDLEY, District Judge.
Respondent issued a complaint on October 21, 1938, amended March 25, 1939, charging that petitioners had violated Sections 2(a), 2(e) and 3 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13(a, e), 14. Petitioners answered denying the charges and averring that, if the acts complained of are prohibited, the statute is unconstitutional when so applied. The ensuing order, which petitioners seek to set aside and respondent to have enforced, directs petitioners to cease and desist from (1) discriminating in prices between purchasers of glucose,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sugar Institute, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Call Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.