Legal Opinion

United States v. Brazil

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 29, 1977No. SPCM 11967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FELDER, Judge:

In January 1976 the appellant pleaded guilty and was convicted of larceny committed in October 1975 and escape from custody committed in January 1976. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for two and a half months. Two issues that were not litigated at trial confront us for resolution.

The first one deals with the sanity of the appellant. Prior to trial at Fort Ord, California, a sanity board, consisting of a military doctor who was assisted by a civilian doctor, concluded that the appellant was legally sane. They evaluated him to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. TriplettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. RolandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. DyerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. FarmerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. RidleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API