Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Phillipy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1883No. 10,664PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— It is insisted by the appellants that the judgment should be reversed for the reason that the special judge, appointed to try this cause, had no .authority to act as such. No objection was made in the court below, and appellants can not here successfully complain- unless the record affirmatively shows that the appointment was without authority of law. This it does not do. There are cases in which a judge pro tempore may be appointed by a judge of the superior court, and as the record discloses nothing to the contrary we must presume this to be such a case. Presumptions are always indulged…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Elston v. PiggottIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Blake v. MinknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Habig v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API