Legal Opinion

Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2008No. S138130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

70 Cal.Rptr.3d 382 (2008)

42 Cal.4th 920

174 P.3d 200

Gary ROSS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

RAGINGWIRE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

No. S138130.

Supreme Court of California.

January 24, 2008.

Joseph D. Elford, Oakland; Law Office of Stewart Katz, Stewart Katz and Costa Kerestenzis, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert A. Raich, Oakland, for California legislators as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel Abrahamson, Tamar Todd and Theshia Naidoo, for American Pain Foundation, American Medical Women's Association, Lymphoma Foundation of America,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API