Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1986No. 8516SC1339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The first of three questions raised by the defendants, either jointly or severally, is whether punishing each of them for both convictions — breaking or entering with the felonious intent to commit larceny therein in violation of G.S. 14-54, and larceny committed pursuant to such breaking or entering as provided in G.S. 14-72(b)(2) — violates the ban against double jeopardy contained in the constitutions of this state and the United States. State v. Edmondson, 316 N.C. 187, 340 S.E. 2d 110 (1986), which upheld earlier holdings to the same effect by this Court, requires that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. BROWN (LARRY) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API