Legal Opinion

State v. Fletcher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1988No. 352A87PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

In his first assignment of error the defendant, relying on State v. Freeland, 316 N.C. 13, 340 S.E. 2d 35 (1986), argues that he was placed in double jeopardy because he was convicted of three separate offenses based on the same act. In Freeland we held that a defendant could not be sentenced for first degree kidnapping and a sexual assault if it was necessary to prove the sexual assault in order to convict the defendant of first degree kidnapping. We held that the intent of the General Assembly in that case was that the defendant not be punished for both offenses. In State v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Stevens v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API