Legal Opinion
City of Hoboken v. Kelly
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided June 15, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WaesohE, President.
This is a motion on behalf of the taxpayers, the several companies constituting the Mew York Central. Eailroad System, to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the appeal complaint filed with this Board on May 17th, 1943, by the taxing district, City of Hoboken, to contest the assessment of property used for railroad purposes, made by the State Tax Commissioner pursuant to chapter 291 of the laws of 1941 and the amendments thereto, N. J. S. A. 54.'2 9A-l et seq., for the 1943 property taxes.
The statute permitting the filing of said complaint reads as follows:
“The authorities of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex parte BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1823
- In Re the County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Ott v. BraddockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Herod v. Mutual Chemical Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Earle v. S. A. Willets & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- In Re NY Central Railroad SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954