Legal Opinion

In Re the County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 13, 1928PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Walker, Chancellor.

The county of Hudson having applied to the Supreme Court for a judgment declaring the rights, status and legal relation of the inhabitants of that county under an act entitled “A supplement to an act entitled ‘An act to regulate elections [Revision of 1920, passed May 5th, 1920] and the amendments and supplements thereto/ which supplemental act was passed October 9th, 1928” (Pamph. L., ch. 291); and the nine justices of that tribunal sat in banc and heard the argument on October 22d, and rendered its decision October 25th, and…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. New Jersey Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API