In Re the County of Hudson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Walker, Chancellor.
The county of Hudson having applied to the Supreme Court for a judgment declaring the rights, status and legal relation of the inhabitants of that county under an act entitled “A supplement to an act entitled ‘An act to regulate elections [Revision of 1920, passed May 5th, 1920] and the amendments and supplements thereto/ which supplemental act was passed October 9th, 1928” (Pamph. L., ch. 291); and the nine justices of that tribunal sat in banc and heard the argument on October 22d, and rendered its decision October 25th, and…
2Cited by26 opinions
- McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- New Jersey Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.