Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ott v. Braddock

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgments are affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskib, Dear, Wells, WolesEeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. MalikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Saslow v. PrevitiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  4. O'Keefe v. Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  5. City of Hoboken v. KellyNew Jersey Tax Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API