Legal Opinion
Mulloney v. Federal Reserve Bank
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 5, 1938No. 7197PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendants’ motion for further particulars. The motion was filed June 28, 1938, pursuant to Rule 21 of the Law Rules of this Court. There are in all 19 defendants, including 12 banking associations, the Boston Clearing House, an unincorporated association, and 6 individuals who are officers in the above.
The plaintiffs declaration is long and prolix, and is replete with vague allegations of misrepresentation, bad faith, libel, slander and coercion, all as parts of a conspiracy to wrong the plaintiff by bringing about the failure of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- O-So-Ezy Mop Co. v. Channell Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- Alaska S. S. Co. v. KatzeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Bodine v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1922
- Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
- Noma Electric Corp. v. Polaroid Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Kraft v. R. H. Macy & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- United States v. DittrichDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1943
- Stefaniak v. BolandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.