Legal Opinion

Alaska S. S. Co. v. Katzeek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1926No. 4834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Error is assigned to the admission of testimony to show that, shortly after the accident, on the renewal of the effort of the crew to remove the boiler, the tackle again broke, causing the boiler to fall. The evidence was offered for the purpose of showing the defendant’s negligence in failing to furnish adequate tackle. Upon that ground the court overruled the objection to its admission, and later, upon the ground that the evidence tended to prove the weight of the boiler, as well as the inade quaey of the tackle, the court overruled the defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mayor of Birmingham v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Kress v. MarklineMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. St. Joseph & Denver City Railroad v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
  4. Femmer v. City of JuneauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Mulloney v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API