Legal Opinion

Noma Electric Corp. v. Polaroid Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 22, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss a counterclaim pleaded by the defendant, Polaroid Corporation. The action was commenced by plaintiffs in the Supreme Court of New York and removed to this court by defendant. The plaintiffs ask for dismissal of the counterclaim on the ground that it alleges a cause of action of which the state court had no jurisdiction; therefore as the jurisdiction of this court in the suit at bar is derivative only, this court lacks jurisdiction of the counterclaim.

The counterclaim prays for an injunction restraining the plaintiffs from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Continental Store Service Co. v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Southern Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bee Mach. Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  2. Sinkbeil v. HandlerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  3. Howe v. AtwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
  4. Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Garcia v. Schlumberger Lift Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API